Does Blowing the Whistle Violate Company Loyalty Essay

Does Blowing the Whistle give away Company Loyalty - Essay ExampleIdeas of the two writes Philosopher Sissela Bok does not supports the fiddle of babble blowing within the judicature. The author says that talk blowing leads to some moral conflicts of whether to speak about the abuses and the neglects. first off the choice of whether the resisting against the rail at doing is in the state-supported busy or not. In this case the whistle blower catch to decide who is the abuse, the amount of menace it carries and will the protest lead to any change. Secondly the whistle blower has to compare the responsibility to divine service semipublic against to the allegiance he owes to his colleagues and the firm. . And thirdly the whistle blower may fear that his act of protest may lead to some problem to his career, his ability to support his family and himself. This conflict may override the above two other conflicts. The author also discusses about the nature of whistle blowing. By the act of whistle blowing, the whistle blower may lead to breach of allegiance, bitterness, dissent and accusation. The whistle blower makes a public disagreement with the authority or a majority view. The more repressive the authority becomes by the challenge, the more risky it becomes in speaking out. The whistle blower hopes to stop the game but his act of blowing whistle on his own team, in turn is seen as a breach to loyalty towards his own team mates. In holding the position he is meant to bind by certain obligations to his colleague and clients. But the loyalty to his clients and colleagues seems to fall weak in front of the loyalty towards the public interest. Blowing of whistle not only violets loyalty towards his colleagues but also toward the hierarchy since he may be the subordinate too. Often this alarming is conjugated by leaving the job. The opposing is sometimes joined by the protest which leads to public attention towards the wrong doing issue. But to be on s afer side those who want to avoid retaliation may leave the organization quietly, secure his position and then blow the whistle. In this way the whistle blower will have a position to speak with the authority without being involved to any vulnerability. The whistle blowers may be effective when it gets the support of the audience. When the whistle blowers are greeted with lack of concern, the message they share drives away. When they are greeted with disbelief, they attract no response at all. And when the audience does not receive or act on the information, the message bounces bum to the whistle blower and injures him. Because of all these possible harmful affects the whistle blower must first score and recheck the authenticity and accuracy of the facts and reports, before going to speak out. The whistle blower must try by means of the regular channels first. Therefore the author feels that the blowing of whistle is violation of loyalty (Bok, 1980, pp. 176-182). The second Autho r Robert A. Larmer supports the act of whistle blowing since the author thinks that this act shows the loyalty of the employee towards his organization. For the author loyalty means action involving good reasons into the interest of a person. But the question remains that what is the good reason that makes to think that it is in the interest of that person. Firstly if an action is immoral then it is not at all justified that the action is in the scoop up interest of the agent. Indeed the author argues that an employee who blows the whistle